Which AI interactions need governance?
Identify the supported systems, users, roles, endpoints, requests, and response data that belong inside the governed path. Traffic must be deliberately routed through Comply for its controls to apply.
Regulated organizations need a consistent way to turn governance decisions into working controls. The practical task is to identify what applies, assign accountable owners, protect confidential information, and connect each requirement to a control and a reviewable record.
Identify the supported systems, users, roles, endpoints, requests, and response data that belong inside the governed path. Traffic must be deliberately routed through Comply for its controls to apply.
Assign owners for policy activation, held-request decisions, integration changes, evidence review, and legal or compliance interpretation. Comply records decisions; accountable people determine whether the control design is sufficient.
The NIST AI Risk Management Framework provides a voluntary structure for managing AI risk. ISO/IEC 42001 defines requirements for an artificial intelligence management system.
These sources can help teams structure governance work. Applicability, interpretation, conformity, and certification decisions remain with qualified legal, compliance, and certification professionals.
Within supported integrations and routes, Ovatio Comply provides mechanisms that can contribute to a broader governance program:
No software makes an organization compliant on its own, and Ovatio Comply is not a certification. It applies configured policy to supported requests deliberately routed through it and records reviewable decision evidence. Your qualified legal, compliance, security, and business owners determine what applies and whether the resulting controls are sufficient.
Use a 30-minute conversation to identify the business issue and decide whether a direct Comply discussion or a separately scoped assessment fits.